move files around and add email options
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc9e9af717
commit
dc6439c94b
@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Only applies to items that exist in both sets of data
|
||||
|
||||
**Change in Price**
|
||||
|
||||
( P₂ - P₁ ) Q₂
|
||||
|
||||
**Change in Quantity**
|
||||
|
||||
( Q₂ - Q₁ ) P₁
|
||||
|
||||
_To further break out change in quantity_
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Change in Quantity - _Volume Related_
|
||||
|
||||
Q₂ ( Q₁ / Σ ( Q₁ ) ) - Q₁
|
||||
|
||||
Change in Quantity - _Mix Related_
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Only applies to items that exist in both sets of data
|
||||
|
||||
**Change in Price**
|
||||
|
||||
( P₂ - P₁ ) Q₂
|
||||
|
||||
**Change in Quantity**
|
||||
|
||||
( Q₂ - Q₁ ) P₁
|
||||
|
||||
_To further break out change in quantity_
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Change in Quantity - _Volume Related_
|
||||
|
||||
Q₂ ( Q₁ / Σ ( Q₁ ) ) - Q₁
|
||||
|
||||
Change in Quantity - _Mix Related_
|
||||
|
||||
Q₂ - Q₂ ( Q₁ / Σ ( Q₁ ) )
|
3
email/selfhosted_options.md
Normal file
3
email/selfhosted_options.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
iredmail
|
||||
mailinabox
|
||||
mailcow
|
@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
|
||||
|
||||
what i'm good at
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
* Modeling historic and forecasted financial & other events
|
||||
1. Employer - Supply Chain Team - Ground up forecasting of sales, inventory, and operations which feeds financial projections down to cash flow
|
||||
2. Employer - Sales Team - Build sales database (Postgres) and analytics for the sales team synced with financials & ledger
|
||||
3. Employer - Ops Team - Develop detailed standard cost transaction ledger for production analytics syned with financials & ledger
|
||||
4. Employer - Finance Team - Develop Ad-Hoc consolidations and real-time financial statement logic
|
||||
5. Side Proj- brother Seth & I - Develop basic general ledger application (in-progress) implementing the concept of basic pecuniary record (Goetz, 1939)
|
||||
6. Side Proj- brother & I - Develop ETL-like tool for quick storage of data from third parties (bank data, competitor products, API results, etc)
|
||||
|
||||
* Dealing with limited-value tasks that need to be done
|
||||
1. State & Local registrations; filings
|
||||
2. Bank recs, account recs
|
||||
3. Integrity of balance sheet
|
||||
4. Audits, formal financial statements
|
||||
|
@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
|
||||
|
||||
new business startup on $1000 and 90 days [blog](https://medium.com/the-mission/seth-godin-new-business-5-step-fdb354988c23)
|
@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
|
||||
CREATE TABLE mast.node
|
||||
(
|
||||
id bigint GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY
|
||||
,nam text
|
||||
,sch text
|
||||
,doc jsonb
|
||||
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE TABLE acct.accm
|
||||
(
|
||||
id bigint GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY
|
||||
,nam text
|
||||
--reference to node ids
|
||||
--should be limited to certain types of nodes, like location, product line, fsline, perhaps an enum?
|
||||
,nodes bigint[]
|
||||
--node attributes pooled here
|
||||
,doc jsonb
|
||||
)
|
@ -1,77 +1,77 @@
|
||||
Logic to setup production plan, inventory balances, purchases, and shipments
|
||||
|
||||
Starting point
|
||||
- known balances STKB
|
||||
- known available BOLH - not posted
|
||||
- known prod schedule SOFT
|
||||
- known shipments Sales Forecast
|
||||
- forecasted orders Sales Forecast
|
||||
- machines that a part can run on ??
|
||||
- actual run-time performance Alternates
|
||||
- actual BOM performance Alternates
|
||||
- actual scrap performance Alternates
|
||||
- available machine time ??
|
||||
|
||||
Populate
|
||||
- forecasted prod schedule
|
||||
- forecasted on-hand (via forecast perpetual transactions)
|
||||
- forecasted available (via forecast transactions)
|
||||
- forecasted purchases
|
||||
|
||||
Iterate through each calendar day
|
||||
1. materialize forecasted purchases
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
2. materialize production
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
3. materialize transfers
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
3. materialize shipments
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
4. process forecasted order submissions
|
||||
1. check for inventory available
|
||||
1. Yes
|
||||
1. mark unavailable
|
||||
2. schedule shipment for request date
|
||||
2. No or partial
|
||||
1. mark unavailable any partial
|
||||
2. schedule on next open slot regardless of request date (each part should be mapped to certain set of machines)
|
||||
1. raw materials available
|
||||
1. Yes
|
||||
1. mark unavailable (at begin prod date?)
|
||||
2. No
|
||||
1. mark unavailable any partial (at begin prod date?)
|
||||
2. schedule a purchase net of lead time
|
||||
2. sub-components available?
|
||||
1. Yes
|
||||
1. mark unavialable (at begin prod date?)
|
||||
2. No
|
||||
1. (return to 4.1.2.2)
|
||||
3. schedule transfer of production after completion if necessary
|
||||
3. schedule shipment for request date, or production date if past request date
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
snap-shot STKB
|
||||
snap-shot BOLH
|
||||
snap-shot SOFT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
some notes
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
* shift schedules
|
||||
* parallel resources
|
||||
* setup time
|
||||
* efficiencies
|
||||
* scrap rates
|
||||
* blends
|
||||
* known 'A' item volumes planned regardless of demand
|
||||
* visibility window for incomming orders
|
||||
* grouping items to reduce change-overs
|
||||
* initial start-up: merge with current machine schedule
|
||||
* limit start date to child item availability
|
||||
* procurement mix
|
||||
* purchase lag
|
||||
* transfer lag
|
||||
* order priority
|
||||
* inventory minimums
|
||||
Logic to setup production plan, inventory balances, purchases, and shipments
|
||||
|
||||
Starting point
|
||||
- known balances STKB
|
||||
- known available BOLH - not posted
|
||||
- known prod schedule SOFT
|
||||
- known shipments Sales Forecast
|
||||
- forecasted orders Sales Forecast
|
||||
- machines that a part can run on ??
|
||||
- actual run-time performance Alternates
|
||||
- actual BOM performance Alternates
|
||||
- actual scrap performance Alternates
|
||||
- available machine time ??
|
||||
|
||||
Populate
|
||||
- forecasted prod schedule
|
||||
- forecasted on-hand (via forecast perpetual transactions)
|
||||
- forecasted available (via forecast transactions)
|
||||
- forecasted purchases
|
||||
|
||||
Iterate through each calendar day
|
||||
1. materialize forecasted purchases
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
2. materialize production
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
3. materialize transfers
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
3. materialize shipments
|
||||
1. update on-hand & available
|
||||
4. process forecasted order submissions
|
||||
1. check for inventory available
|
||||
1. Yes
|
||||
1. mark unavailable
|
||||
2. schedule shipment for request date
|
||||
2. No or partial
|
||||
1. mark unavailable any partial
|
||||
2. schedule on next open slot regardless of request date (each part should be mapped to certain set of machines)
|
||||
1. raw materials available
|
||||
1. Yes
|
||||
1. mark unavailable (at begin prod date?)
|
||||
2. No
|
||||
1. mark unavailable any partial (at begin prod date?)
|
||||
2. schedule a purchase net of lead time
|
||||
2. sub-components available?
|
||||
1. Yes
|
||||
1. mark unavialable (at begin prod date?)
|
||||
2. No
|
||||
1. (return to 4.1.2.2)
|
||||
3. schedule transfer of production after completion if necessary
|
||||
3. schedule shipment for request date, or production date if past request date
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
snap-shot STKB
|
||||
snap-shot BOLH
|
||||
snap-shot SOFT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
some notes
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
* shift schedules
|
||||
* parallel resources
|
||||
* setup time
|
||||
* efficiencies
|
||||
* scrap rates
|
||||
* blends
|
||||
* known 'A' item volumes planned regardless of demand
|
||||
* visibility window for incomming orders
|
||||
* grouping items to reduce change-overs
|
||||
* initial start-up: merge with current machine schedule
|
||||
* limit start date to child item availability
|
||||
* procurement mix
|
||||
* purchase lag
|
||||
* transfer lag
|
||||
* order priority
|
||||
* inventory minimums
|
||||
* tool availability
|
@ -1,51 +1,51 @@
|
||||
A method to planning sales
|
||||
----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
1. copy history
|
||||
|
||||
1. start with open orders
|
||||
2. add orders as placed in past
|
||||
1. true-up to current run rate
|
||||
1. normalize price for current pricing
|
||||
1. will need to idenitfy blocks in the base period that best represent pricing efforts
|
||||
2. scale prior periods to match final pricing
|
||||
2. exclude expired products/customers
|
||||
3. scale new developments to reflect full-year (new products customers)
|
||||
4. update cost to current
|
||||
5. request date attainment performance
|
||||
3. walk prior period sales to new baseline sales as change in run-rate
|
||||
|
||||
2. build in changes to current run-rate
|
||||
|
||||
1. volume changes
|
||||
2. pricing changes
|
||||
3. new products (must be defined in future at a mininum)
|
||||
4. future cost changes
|
||||
5. request date attainment
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| timeline | day | running days | responsible |
|
||||
| -------------------------------------------- | --- | ------------ | ----------- |
|
||||
| **_establish run-rate sales_** | | | |
|
||||
| copy history | 1 | 1 | executor |
|
||||
| identify pricing windows | 1 | 2 | sales team |
|
||||
| scale windows to match final | 1 | 3 | executor |
|
||||
| identify expired products/customers | 3 | 6 | sales team |
|
||||
| eliminate expired volume | 1 | 7 | executor |
|
||||
| identify new products/customers | 3 | 10 | sales team |
|
||||
| scale new to full year volume | 1 | 11 | executor |
|
||||
| **_load new plans_** | | | |
|
||||
| layer in planned changes not yet implemented | | | |
|
||||
| identify changes to existing volume | 3 | 14 | sales team |
|
||||
| load changes | 1 | 15 | executor |
|
||||
| identify changes in price | 3 | 18 | sales team |
|
||||
| load changes | 1 | 19 | executor |
|
||||
| identify new products | 3 | 22 | sales team |
|
||||
| load new | 1 | 23 | executor |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Table Layout
|
||||
A method to planning sales
|
||||
----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
1. copy history
|
||||
|
||||
1. start with open orders
|
||||
2. add orders as placed in past
|
||||
1. true-up to current run rate
|
||||
1. normalize price for current pricing
|
||||
1. will need to idenitfy blocks in the base period that best represent pricing efforts
|
||||
2. scale prior periods to match final pricing
|
||||
2. exclude expired products/customers
|
||||
3. scale new developments to reflect full-year (new products customers)
|
||||
4. update cost to current
|
||||
5. request date attainment performance
|
||||
3. walk prior period sales to new baseline sales as change in run-rate
|
||||
|
||||
2. build in changes to current run-rate
|
||||
|
||||
1. volume changes
|
||||
2. pricing changes
|
||||
3. new products (must be defined in future at a mininum)
|
||||
4. future cost changes
|
||||
5. request date attainment
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| timeline | day | running days | responsible |
|
||||
| -------------------------------------------- | --- | ------------ | ----------- |
|
||||
| **_establish run-rate sales_** | | | |
|
||||
| copy history | 1 | 1 | executor |
|
||||
| identify pricing windows | 1 | 2 | sales team |
|
||||
| scale windows to match final | 1 | 3 | executor |
|
||||
| identify expired products/customers | 3 | 6 | sales team |
|
||||
| eliminate expired volume | 1 | 7 | executor |
|
||||
| identify new products/customers | 3 | 10 | sales team |
|
||||
| scale new to full year volume | 1 | 11 | executor |
|
||||
| **_load new plans_** | | | |
|
||||
| layer in planned changes not yet implemented | | | |
|
||||
| identify changes to existing volume | 3 | 14 | sales team |
|
||||
| load changes | 1 | 15 | executor |
|
||||
| identify changes in price | 3 | 18 | sales team |
|
||||
| load changes | 1 | 19 | executor |
|
||||
| identify new products | 3 | 22 | sales team |
|
||||
| load new | 1 | 23 | executor |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Table Layout
|
@ -1,37 +1,37 @@
|
||||
[mailing_list](https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHq%2BKHJOvZT8M-o_sE%2BQzqqBGnUjNubWo_rRmpHZyw5ZUuaseg%40mail.gmail.com)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
wouldn't that be Pg authing against the OS (pam) which in turn is forwarding to krb5? which seems like an extra added step
|
||||
|
||||
sfrost [11:11 AM]
|
||||
it's basically this:
|
||||
ktpass -out postgres.keytab -princ
|
||||
POSTGRES/centos(at)MY(dot)TESTDOMAIN(dot)LAN -mapUser enterprisedb -pass XXXXXX
|
||||
-crypto DES-CBC-MD5
|
||||
(except adjusted a bit to make it not use a shitty crypto)
|
||||
you use ktpass to create your keytab file
|
||||
copy the keytab file to the Linux box
|
||||
|
||||
arossouw [11:12 AM]
|
||||
Seems like effort, i'll just play dumb on that one
|
||||
|
||||
sfrost [11:12 AM]
|
||||
oh, gotta fix the princ too or whatever
|
||||
but it's not that hard
|
||||
and you might have to configure the realms, but not necessairly (that info is often in DNS already)
|
||||
then you just tell PG where the keytab file is, set gssapi in PG's hba.conf, and create your users using their princ names, like 'sfrost@SNOWMAN.NET'
|
||||
|
||||
dtseiler [11:13 AM]
|
||||
I’m with @hunleyd, I’d love to see a great howto post on that.
|
||||
|
||||
arossouw [11:14 AM]
|
||||
I suppose the question is what is the advantage of using kerberos, and then deciding if its worth spending time on
|
||||
|
||||
sfrost [11:14 AM]
|
||||
I just wrote it
|
||||
^^^ see above
|
||||
also wrote the advantage...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
hunleyd [11:14 AM]
|
||||
[mailing_list](https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHq%2BKHJOvZT8M-o_sE%2BQzqqBGnUjNubWo_rRmpHZyw5ZUuaseg%40mail.gmail.com)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
wouldn't that be Pg authing against the OS (pam) which in turn is forwarding to krb5? which seems like an extra added step
|
||||
|
||||
sfrost [11:11 AM]
|
||||
it's basically this:
|
||||
ktpass -out postgres.keytab -princ
|
||||
POSTGRES/centos(at)MY(dot)TESTDOMAIN(dot)LAN -mapUser enterprisedb -pass XXXXXX
|
||||
-crypto DES-CBC-MD5
|
||||
(except adjusted a bit to make it not use a shitty crypto)
|
||||
you use ktpass to create your keytab file
|
||||
copy the keytab file to the Linux box
|
||||
|
||||
arossouw [11:12 AM]
|
||||
Seems like effort, i'll just play dumb on that one
|
||||
|
||||
sfrost [11:12 AM]
|
||||
oh, gotta fix the princ too or whatever
|
||||
but it's not that hard
|
||||
and you might have to configure the realms, but not necessairly (that info is often in DNS already)
|
||||
then you just tell PG where the keytab file is, set gssapi in PG's hba.conf, and create your users using their princ names, like 'sfrost@SNOWMAN.NET'
|
||||
|
||||
dtseiler [11:13 AM]
|
||||
I’m with @hunleyd, I’d love to see a great howto post on that.
|
||||
|
||||
arossouw [11:14 AM]
|
||||
I suppose the question is what is the advantage of using kerberos, and then deciding if its worth spending time on
|
||||
|
||||
sfrost [11:14 AM]
|
||||
I just wrote it
|
||||
^^^ see above
|
||||
also wrote the advantage...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
hunleyd [11:14 AM]
|
||||
maybe i'll try this as a 10% project some day
|
@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
|
||||
pivot table (done)
|
||||
* order days
|
||||
* ASP & ASC
|
||||
* calendar year
|
||||
|
||||
data rebuild
|
||||
* Field names need to make sense and then evaluate
|
||||
* Break out bill-to ship-to
|
||||
* difference between forecast and actual, or budget and actual
|
||||
* orders versus budget
|
||||
* sales versus budget
|
||||
* bring currency or value in original currency
|
||||
* open orders - request date
|
||||
* forecasted available date (Marty claims it is available)
|
||||
* get rid of goofy fields like `FLAG-O`
|
||||
|
||||
forecasting
|
||||
* Forecast iterations (evaluate at time all the other fields evaluated)
|
||||
* Mechanism to build a live self-informing forecast
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user