mirror of https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
0f4f7d32ce
The namespacing for healthchecks for neovim modules is inconsistent and confusing. The completion for `:checkhealth` with `--clean` gives ``` nvim provider.clipboard provider.node provider.perl provider.python provider.ruby vim.lsp vim.treesitter ``` There are now three top-level module names for nvim: `nvim`, `provider` and `vim` with no signs of stopping. The `nvim` name is especially confusing as it does not contain all neovim checkhealths, which makes it almost a decoy healthcheck. The confusion only worsens if you add plugins to the mix: ``` lazy mason nvim nvim-treesitter provider.clipboard provider.node provider.perl provider.python provider.ruby telescope vim.lsp vim.treesitter ``` Another problem with the current approach is that it's not easy to run nvim-only healthchecks since they don't share the same namespace. The current approach would be to run `:che nvim vim.* provider.*` and would also require the user to know these are the neovim modules. Instead, use this alternative structure: ``` vim.health vim.lsp vim.provider.clipboard vim.provider.node vim.provider.perl vim.provider.python vim.provider.ruby vim.treesitter ``` and ``` lazy mason nvim-treesitter telescope vim.health vim.lsp vim.provider.clipboard vim.provider.node vim.provider.perl vim.provider.python vim.provider.ruby vim.treesitter ``` Now, the entries are properly sorted and running nvim-only healthchecks requires running only `:che vim.*`. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| api | ||
| autocmd | ||
| core | ||
| editor | ||
| ex_cmds | ||
| fixtures | ||
| legacy | ||
| lua | ||
| options | ||
| plugin | ||
| provider | ||
| script | ||
| shada | ||
| terminal | ||
| treesitter | ||
| ui | ||
| vimscript | ||
| example_spec.lua | ||
| preload.lua | ||
| testnvim.lua | ||